Life Examples Of Angles

We are still against tuition fees!

The consequences of the introduction of tuition fees

The collection of tuition fees has aggravated the financial situation of many students considerably. Worse, the fees could not even be applied to several hundred students, they had to cancel their studies involuntarily, others try their last semester to finance through debt. The number of new enrollments first went back across the country and increases only very slightly again, while significantly greater increase in the number of eligible students. The number of international students continues to decline, but also of institutions as the HRK and the DAAD is accepted, under the guidance of the "free mover", well-funded students and the management of the German student's "to be kept free for the degree course should
capacity.

fees thus mean an attack on the financially vulnerable. They should be forced out of the universities, or at least to pay dearly for it. Thus, a further stage of selection occurs in anyway highly selective German school system. The door is towards further commercialization of education and pushed through an artificial shortage of ways to qualify, a "market" for education should be generated. A billion dollar business, which of course implies the undermining of education as a public mandate, it makes for sale, but for goods. Social justice is irrelevant, only one justice market, the competition is to distinguish between "worthy" and "unworthy".

-award tuition fees? No thanks!

cooperate and then seriously at "reasonable" allocation of student fees? That can not be serious! The decision to launch went over the heads of the non-professorial members of the majority of the university, was on the social consequences and hardships passed over ice-cold. And this majority, nothing has changed.

How can something other than the unconditional abolition of tuition fees are a reasonable allocation of revenue? Everything else, on the backs of the financially weakest create a field for the profile and resume. For a participation in such bodies means but the assumption that there ever a meaningful award and thus is also justified charging of tuition fees. This is cynical and wrong, or maybe just naive. The university administration can also point out that "the students who participated
but" it "so a democratic process" WAS. This legitimacy can not exist, a fundamental criticism and rejection is the only thing that makes sense. The resistance must be expressed extra-parliamentary, everyday life can not go on just as much injustice is carried out.

Therefore, there was the student strike in June to bestreiken this education system, with its implications and consequences, to criticize and speak out. Therefore, students have to the Senate meetings were held concerning the continuation of the tuition fees survey protested loudly. Therefore, a tuition boycott is organized to turn off its Gebührenapologeten the tap.

resistance and protest sometimes means Rabatz ¡! to make to be loud to express the anger and not just dumb to submit to the rules of the game and believe in the immutability of the world's course. Do not take anything you like but get active! The only way you can make a difference!